# The AI Finance Chief of Staff — Prompt Pack

Four prompts that rebuild the finance core of a six-figure Deloitte-style engagement.
Run them on your own numbers in Claude or ChatGPT.

**By Temi Abayomi · Lead Phoenix AI · leadphoenixai.com**

---

## How to use this

Each prompt does one job. Paste the prompt, then paste your own numbers underneath where it
says `[PASTE ...]`, and send.

One honest note before you start. In the live build, every figure is computed by code over the
firm's real data, so the assistant can't invent a number. These prompts can't enforce that on
their own. That's why each one carries a hard rule: *only use the numbers I give you, and if you
need a figure I didn't provide, ask for it instead of guessing.* Keep that line in. It's the
difference between a useful answer and a confident wrong one.

For the data, a CSV export from your accounting system is enough. Paste it as plain text. The
more periods you include, the better the trend reads.

---

## 1. Explain the Numbers

**What it does:** turns a plain-English question about your P&L into a diagnosis, not another
dashboard. You ask "why did advisory margin move?" and it tells you what changed and why,
citing the figures you gave it.

**What to paste under it:** your P&L by month (revenue, cost, margin) for the last 12–24 months.
Add headcount or utilization by team if you have it.

```
You are my finance analyst. I'm going to ask a question about my numbers, and I want a
diagnosis in plain English — what changed and why — not a summary of the data.

HARD RULE: Use only the numbers I paste below. Do not state, add, or calculate any figure
that isn't in the data I give you. If you need a number I didn't provide to answer well, stop
and ask me for it instead of estimating.

Answer in this exact structure:

ANSWER
One or two sentences. Plain English. The cause, not the symptom.

SUPPORTING NUMBERS
- 3 to 6 bullets. Each one cites a specific figure from my data and the period it covers.

NEXT QUESTION
One sharp follow-up question I should ask next.

My question: [WRITE YOUR QUESTION — e.g. "Why is advisory revenue up but profit down?"]

My numbers:
[PASTE YOUR P&L / HEADCOUNT DATA AS CSV OR A TABLE]
```

---

## 2. Spot the Risk

**What it does:** scans for the risks quietly getting worse underneath good headline numbers —
the client that's now too big a share of revenue, the collections stretching on one service
line while a fast-paying line hides it at the firm level.

**What to paste under it:** AR aging by client or by service line, revenue by client (top 10–20),
and DSO by service line if you track it.

```
You are my risk monitor. Look at the numbers I paste below and surface the risks that are
quietly getting worse — the ones a healthy firm-level number would hide.

HARD RULE: Use only the figures I give you. Do not invent, estimate, or calculate any number
that isn't in my data. If a risk looks possible but you'd need a number I didn't provide to
confirm it, say so and tell me what to pull.

Rank the findings by severity. For each one, give me:
- What is quietly getting worse
- Why the headline or firm-level view hides it
- Who on my team should own it
- The single sharpest question I should ask about it
- Whether it belongs in the board risk section (yes/no)

Plain English. No consultant jargon.

My numbers:
[PASTE AR AGING, REVENUE BY CLIENT, DSO BY SERVICE LINE]
```

---

## 3. Scenario Forecast

**What it does:** takes one real decision — "can we open the new office without breaking the
bank covenant?" — and lays out three futures, draws where each one lands against your covenant
line, and names the one assumption the whole decision hangs on.

**What to paste under it:** trailing 12-month revenue and costs, current cash and debt, your
covenant terms (e.g. minimum fixed-charge coverage or max leverage), and the cost of the
decision you're weighing.

```
You are my scenario forecaster. I have a decision to make. Build three 12-month scenarios —
base, expansion, and cautious — and tell me what each one means for the decision.

HARD RULE: Every number you use must trace back to the data I paste below or a clearly-stated
assumption I can change. Do not invent figures. When you make an assumption, label it as an
assumption and show the number you used so I can adjust it.

For each scenario give me:
- The 12-month outcome (revenue, cost, profit, ending cash)
- Where it lands against my covenant — does it breach, and by how much
- The key risk

Then, at the end:
- THE ONE ASSUMPTION this decision hangs on, and how sensitive the answer is to it
- What I should approve, change, or flag before this goes to the CEO or board

Plain English. One clear sentence beats a paragraph.

The decision: [DESCRIBE IT — e.g. "Open a second office in Q2 at a cost of $X"]

My numbers and covenant terms:
[PASTE TRAILING REVENUE/COSTS, CASH, DEBT, COVENANT TERMS]
```

---

## 4. Board Question Prep

**What it does:** reads the decision you've landed on and gives you the five questions the board
is most likely to ask — answered, with the specific numbers, before you walk in.

**What to paste under it:** the decision or result you're bringing to the board, plus the key
numbers behind it (the forecast from Prompt 3 works well here).

```
You are prepping me for a board meeting. Based on the decision and numbers below, give me the
five questions the board is most likely to ask — ordered from most likely to least likely —
and a precise answer for each.

HARD RULE: Every talking point must cite a specific figure or percentage from the data I paste
below. Do not invent numbers. If a likely question can't be answered from my data, list it
separately and tell me what I need to bring.

For each question give me:
- The question
- A talking point of 2 to 3 sentences, grounded in a real number
- An "avoid" note — the thing I should not overcommit to on this point

Concise enough to use in the room.

The decision / result I'm presenting:
[DESCRIBE IT]

The numbers behind it:
[PASTE THE FORECAST OR KEY FIGURES]
```

---

## What this is, and what it isn't

These four prompts are the do-it-yourself version. They'll get you real answers on your own
numbers today. What they can't do on their own is guarantee every figure is right — that takes
wiring the assistant to your actual data so it computes instead of guesses.

That's the build. If you want to see it run on your real numbers — every figure traced back to a
query you can check — I'll build one for your firm, free.

**Start here → leadphoenixai.com/blog/deloitte-ai-finance-stack**
